Adding to Cart…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12ec8/12ec879a5d4440bab10c609fefaac76dad87635c" alt=""
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.You currently have no notifications.
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Comments
Yeah, I don't use the forum's spell check anymore. I have a plugin for Chrome that does it. "Check Spelling" does work occasionally.
ipad predictive text easiest and only thing I currently don't get the cookie popup on every page on
at least on Safari
hate even visiting the store on desktop thanks to that constant popupdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1eae/e1eae646ba6ddff4f31a0d850d751a54ffe0989c" alt="angry angry"
fixed it and had it break again too many time,only site that does it
Richard's typos are both part of the charm and also a result of him running across the keyboard to give us quick responses.
Yes, I do need to upgrade - sadly that requires entering credit card details without any typos, which is askijng a bit much. Still, that is a pretty good likeness based on the limited information available (well, I hope it's based only on the limited information that is available).
It is sad fact, and probably a reflection of actual chronological age, that I find typos much easier to spot on paper than on screen.
Nice to see that even moderators manage to pull a thread into the off-topic area when they sink their claws into it
Nicely derailed thread
This thread is actually about the fact that Daz has placed plugins, body shapes and other Daz content behind a rent-to-use paywall. There is concern this practice will continue and that Daz could place more and more plugins and other content behind the paywall as time goes on. We do not, of course, know what Daz will actually do. We must wait to see what happens.
It is not a happy happy subject.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0283/b0283c104cbb5d5e02918d4d78c75eee3cf810f4" alt="frown frown"
Any resemblance to actual cats or computers is entirely coincidental, as they say.
I like your render, barbult. Here's a quick one I did-Richard at home, greyed from his experience, analyzing the world while his paws navigate the keyboard.
That has a touch of "Welcome, Mr Bond, we have ben expecting you." I'm pretty sure my real home fails all measures for a supervillain hide-out.
Oh I would have loved to have an aquarium of exotic, dangerous fish nearby. Good for the bond villain aesthetic as well as an occasional snack. Win/win.
The renders are super cute for sure, but the actual subject of the thread was really interesting. So I'll get back to that if I may.
The main thing with subscriptions, in my view, is this: companies (I'm not saying DAZ, mind) could easily offer different models alongside each other, like a subscription and a pay once model where maybe the price is a bit higher. The one thing - subscriptions - is more profitable for the company, the other - pay once - more so for many customers. Which is why customers keep asking for this second method to return across all kinds of digital goods genres. A company which knows this and which values its customers' interests besides its own would naturally offer both. Vice versa, if the company positively knows customers would also like this second model, and doesn't offer it, this tells me personally that there is only one exclusive interest on that company's virtual mind. And it's not the customer's.
That is not a happy situation for the customers. And it doesn't bode well for future developments.
Yes, I know DAZ's business model is quite different from, say, a game company's. The question that's been staring at me for a while now though is: Does DAZ still know this?
Thanks for the feedback on the render!
I agree that, generally, the model of going subscription based is much more beneficial to the company over the consumer. I think they should remove the Premier-only content as to help alleviate the stigma it's generated from day one. I hope Daz understands this, but I'm going to keep doing what I'm doing and if one day they announce a subscription is required, I'll see the entire deal and make a decision. It really comes down to value; if we had a required subscription, but the prices across the board were greatly reduced, that might not be such a bad thing. There's really no way around it-they would have to do something like that to have subscriptions.
We just don't have any information about what the plans (if any) there are for that, so I'm not having it affect me as I can't control it. I have enough stress going and I'm going pretty grey as a result of it. O_O
I feel you, especially in that last paragraph - it's really really hard to keep stress at harmless levels these days!
The thing is though, all these money-related issues we can change. By discussing them, and letting companies know about our feelings, and then choosing which companies to support by buying from them. Unfortunately, for this to work, one has to engage with potentially stressful stuff. It's a bummer really, but can't be helped, lest we do lose all control we have. Again, my personal take, obviously.
I've seen several applicatios/suites switch to a subcription model and although some of us are unhappy it seems that the majority do actually like the easy entry point (which doesn't, of course, apply with a free application like Daz Studio). We need to be wary of assuming our strongly-felt preferences are the norm (see also: male content, low heeled shoes, historically-accurate clothing and props, and so on).
I'm constantly getting it too no matter what I click - accept, preferances - accept or decline all it keeps popping up been few days now gives me a headache and stresses me out which I suffer from a lot