What's with this New Idea ...

acanthisacanthis Posts: 604
edited January 2016 in The Commons

.

Post edited by acanthis on

Comments

  • CypherFOXCypherFOX Posts: 3,401
    edited December 1969

    Greetings,
    Unfortunately, looking at your post time, you're at around midnight DAZ time. Sometime between 11pm and 1am their time they do something which intermittently locks up the database, and folks can't do shopping cart operations until it's done. All the operations are queued, but it silently queues them instead of telling you, so it looks like nothing's happening.


    I'm sure it's on their list of 'to be fixed' problems, but I bet it's deeper down the Magento rathole than they ever expected to have to go.


    If I were to hazard a guess, it'd be that they're running daily statistics for sales reports for themselves and the PA's, and carts/sales being active might gum that up. I think there are better ways to do that, but I'm sure it's the best they could do with the resources and knowledge they have, and I'm VERY sure that there are circumstances beyond my knowledge that make them do things this way.


    -- Morgan

  • PennamePenname Posts: 343
    edited December 1969

    Ah, I think that it was around that time when I had the same issue, so there may be something to that, Cypherfox. When, after multiple attempts to put one item in my cart, I finally ended up with about 6. When I couldn't delete, I moved them to my wishlist. . . and had to delete all those the next day. I have since figured out that you just have to wait, but this is a favoured shopping time for me (well, OK, I'll shop any time) so something to watch.

  • acanthisacanthis Posts: 604
    edited January 2016

    .

    Post edited by acanthis on
  • Richard HaseltineRichard Haseltine Posts: 101,354
    edited December 1969

    The truth is the site was tested but the move to the public servers introduced new issues that hadn't been found by the testing groups.

  • ErdehelErdehel Posts: 386
    edited July 2012

    Kidding?

    Post edited by Erdehel on
  • ChoholeChohole Posts: 33,604
    edited December 1969

    Not at all

  • SpitSpit Posts: 2,342
    edited December 1969

    The truth is the site was tested but the move to the public servers introduced new issues that hadn't been found by the testing groups.

    Yeah caching and volume. Other than that everything worked okay, right?

    Sigh

    Hey, I kinow you guys tried and did your best. But this whole thing still reeks. And why can't we have the old forums back? Just keep it totally separate from the store, make us get a new log in. I'd be happy with that. Then LEAVE IT ALONE.

  • ErdehelErdehel Posts: 386
    edited July 2012

    chohole said:
    Not at all

    Sorry for my comment. Maybe I missed the irony here.

    Post edited by Erdehel on
  • CypherFOXCypherFOX Posts: 3,401
    edited December 1969

    Greetings,
    I am curious; the forums seem remarkably stable and functional to me. They're missing two features, the avatars and post-bumping, but otherwise it behaves almost identically to the old forums. If those two features were working, would that return it to acceptable behavior, or is there some other forum-based feature that I'm missing that is crucial to the experience?


    -- Morgan

  • SpottedKittySpottedKitty Posts: 7,232
    edited December 1969

    Cypherfox said:
    They're missing two features, the avatars and post-bumping, but otherwise it behaves almost identically to the old forums.

    Three features. Colour options. The current forum appearance is not as bad as the original infliction of the previous big change, which caused migraines and eyestrain, and anyone prone to epilepsy had to be careful while scrolling. I don't consider that a glowing endorsement. And the current complete and utter shambles of the store and PC means that has to be fixed first before the forums. There were fixes made in the first few weeks, but those were to critical functions; these three features aren't as urgent, so we'll just have to wait... some more.

    It's been two months...
  • namffuaknamffuak Posts: 4,153
    edited December 1969

    Four features.


    I'm on dial-up. I used to be able to right-click and open in new tab on four or five forum threads and then shift to the first and start reading it while images loaded. The new forum insists on downloading the entire paqge and all content BEFORE starting to render anything on the screen. Even worse, without the avatars, the page content is more than triple the old forum page size.


    So I'm left looking at a blank screen for minutes at a time - and about 3 times out of five, after all the download activity finishes I STILL don't get a srren rendered and have to reload the page. I've pretty much given up on the forums except when I'm at a wifi hotspot.

  • ColdrakeColdrake Posts: 236
    edited December 1969

    Cypherfox said:
    Greetings,
    I am curious; the forums seem remarkably stable and functional to me. They're missing two features, the avatars and post-bumping, but otherwise it behaves almost identically to the old forums. If those two features were working, would that return it to acceptable behavior, or is there some other forum-based feature that I'm missing that is crucial to the experience?


    -- Morgan


    I think those two features would do it for me. A link to the newest post in the thread would be nice, but I can live without it.


    Coldrake

  • Satira CapriccioSatira Capriccio Posts: 523
    edited December 1969

    Five features.

    I remained logged into the old forums unless I logged out intentionally.

    Now, I have to log in every visit, unless I visit and log into the store first.


    Six features.

    Old forums consistently notified you of a PM. Didn't matter where you were in the forums, if you had a PM, you knew it.

    Now it's hit and miss whether the forums indicate a PM.

  • CypherFOXCypherFOX Posts: 3,401
    edited July 2012

    Greetings,
    I know that the old forums logged people out regularly; there are furious posts aplenty on that. Just like here, it wasn't happening to everybody. Evidently the diagram of folks it is happening to has shifted. :-/ I'm not saying it's 'okay' to do that, but that it's not a significant difference from the old forums. (It should still be fixed, although keeping two sites (the forum and the store) logged in and in sync is a PITA.)


    I don't use the PM feature very much; I've never missed a PM, but I don't know how the old system reported them. (I don't think I ever sent a PM on the old system, much less received one.)


    The speed is unfortunate; a quick check of a mostly-text thread shows around 271K transferred, which is a lot. Most of it is because they are using both jQuery and Prototype libraries, and Prototype isn't minified. They also aren't aggregating their JavaScript files, or CSS, or using sprites, nor are many of their resources returning 304 not modified so the browser can cache them. They are at least using compression... I'm not sure how tuned the old site was, but I agree the current site is slow, from a web developer's perspective. I would strongly recommend trying another browser; a different browser might be willing to display the page before all the extra resources have loaded, albiet with a few visual inconsistencies as things pop into place. One way or another, it's definitely not designed for light browsing.


    For theming, I think RAMWolff has a theming plugin for improving the color usage on the forums. The key thing to remember, though, is that strong colors will alter the perception of images that are posted up. A picture against a green background will be perceived differently than a picture against a neutral gray or white background. I don't recall if there's a 'better grays' version of the theme, but there should be, to preserve the ability to see art in a neutral frame.


    All those are very valid answers. If you use PMs a lot, that feature means you're a little less social in your own way. The theme is perhaps too contrast-y for some eyes, which means you avoid the site consciously or unconsciously. The speed is terrible for dial-up and satellite users, so they can't spend as much time interacting. The lack of post-bumping means you can't gravitate to where the people are and get that hit of 'social interaction' which keeps you interested. And a lack of avatars means you don't have that visual connection to people's images, so there isn't as much a feeling of community.


    I don't think each of these problems affects everybody, but it does mean that everybody has a different gripe about the system. (For example, I don't use PMs, the theme works fine for me, I'm on a godawful fast connection, and I don't recall being unexpectedly logged out since the old forums.) This puts the bar at easing a significant part of the unhappy contingent pretty high. Until a majority of that is resolved, a lot of people will still be very unhappy because they perceive little or no movement in the things they care about.


    Thanks very much for the answers! I wish I could do something about them the way I have with the old forum and the store's UI issues, but most of those are things that DAZ has to fix, and that are generally hard even for experienced web dev teams.


    -- Morgan

    Post edited by CypherFOX on
  • MADMANMIKEMADMANMIKE Posts: 407
    edited December 1969

    Five features.

    I remained logged into the old forums unless I logged out intentionally.

    Now, I have to log in every visit, unless I visit and log into the store first.


    Six features.

    Old forums consistently notified you of a PM. Didn't matter where you were in the forums, if you had a PM, you knew it.

    Now it's hit and miss whether the forums indicate a PM.

    How about eight features?

    I frequent multiple sites and usually upload my images to DeviantArt and then link them here. Offsite image linking doesn't work.

    Likewise, you can't link offsite to an image here.

    For a site dedicated to ART, these are pretty big fricken' oversights...

  • ChoholeChohole Posts: 33,604
    edited December 1969

    Likewise, you can’t link offsite to an image here.


    Haven't tried linking to an image offsite, but you can link from forum to forum, so I don't see why it wouldn't work as an offsite link

    http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?&ACT=50&fid=3&aid=7576_q2ub0fP58iIuWeHVolvT&board_id=1
  • Miss BMiss B Posts: 3,071
    edited July 2012

    I frequent multiple sites and usually upload my images to DeviantArt and then link them here. Offsite image linking doesn't work.

    Likewise, you can't link offsite to an image here.

    For a site dedicated to ART, these are pretty big fricken' oversights...


    Actually that's not an oversight, that's a preventative measure so that a site's server bandwidth isn't stolen. It's considered "hotlinking", and I have my site set up so that no one can link to any of my graphics on another site. They'll be rudely surprised when they try.

    A site owner is give a certain amount of bandwidth, and every time they go over that bandwidth, they have to pay extra. Whether they are doing it, or someone else is doing it by hotlinking to graphics sitting on their server, doesn't make a difference. The site owner is going to be the one paying for it. Considering the size of the membership on this site, that could run into a very large fee.

    Post edited by Miss B on
  • namffuaknamffuak Posts: 4,153
    edited December 1969

    Cypherfox said:
    Greetings,

    The speed is unfortunate; a quick check of a mostly-text thread shows around 271K transferred, which is a lot. Most of it is because they are using both jQuery and Prototype libraries, and Prototype isn't minified. They also aren't aggregating their JavaScript files, or CSS, or using sprites, nor are many of their resources returning 304 not modified so the browser can cache them. They are at least using compression... I'm not sure how tuned the old site was, but I agree the current site is slow, from a web developer's perspective. I would strongly recommend trying another browser; a different browser might be willing to display the page before all the extra resources have loaded, albiet with a few visual inconsistencies as things pop into place. One way or another, it's definitely not designed for light browsing.

    -- Morgan


    Thanks for the background on the issues -- I learned just enough Apache a few years back to get a Xymon server up and running. Nothing fancier than SSL and LDAP authentication on Windows AD, because you don't want 'fancy' on the box you use to tell you that other systems are down. :-)


    I will be trying chrome - I'm currently on firefox and have been getting a bit unhappy about some of the changes in it anyway. I do hope the web guys at DAZ can clean some of this up, as right now it is VERY painful to try browsing the forums from home.

Sign In or Register to comment.