Script / Code for High to Low based on full price?

31415926543141592654 Posts: 975

Good day everyone,

I am working on organizing my huge collection of items. One thing I would really like to do is be able to list on the Daz Studio Shop page my owned items based on the full price (not the current sales price) from high to low. I can get my stuff to list and I can get high to low to list ... but I am unable to figure out how to get it by full price. What type of code or search parameter am I missing? Thanks for the help in advance.

Pi Man

Post edited by 3141592654 on

Comments

  • MelanieLMelanieL Posts: 7,379

    I asked @Ati / @Overdrawn if this could be done as an extra feature in their Browser Add-On some time ago (I too would find it really useful) but I think I was in a minority of one (two now?) so didn't get the feature added.

    I'll be interested to see if you can find a way to do it...

  • 31415926543141592654 Posts: 975

    I think part of not adding it to the Browser Add-On is also the fact that it already keeps the browser so busy calculating things that they do not want to add more features which might risk making it unstable.

    Perhaps they would give me / us the code without placing it in the Add-On.  Perhaps I can offer a small Gift Card as compensation ... or, if they are interested in the topic(s), some of my books. 

    How do we get their attention?

  • MelanieLMelanieL Posts: 7,379

    PM? I think Overdrawn is the actual scripter of the pair.

  • OverdrawnOverdrawn Posts: 580

    Hi folks, and thanks for the suggestion!

    It should be possible--as we do have that data already. The "hard" part would be mostly around making the language clear in the UI so folks don't get confused by what they're sorting on. Maybe "Full Price Low-High" and "Full Price High-Low"?

  • MelanieLMelanieL Posts: 7,379

    That sounds perfect!

  • AtiAti Posts: 9,130

    I think part of not adding it to the Browser Add-On is also the fact that it already keeps the browser so busy calculating things that they do not want to add more features which might risk making it unstable.

    This is my main concern. This is not a feature many people would use, so putting in the extra resource requirements for everyone (even if just the checks to see if it's enabled) is not something I would be too happy with.

  • MelanieLMelanieL Posts: 7,379

    Well, I guess I wouldn't want to make the browser add-on unstable or difficult for people - at the moment for me it runs really fast and I love it!

  • OverdrawnOverdrawn Posts: 580
    I don't think it'd be that bad, but we'll see. :)
Sign In or Register to comment.