Female has less autofit options than male G2?

JUJUJUJU Posts: 1,131
edited December 2013 in The Commons

Hi
I wonder why G2Female has less options in the autofit tool than the male one.....
Will G2F be updated "soon"?
Has anybody information about this?

Image removed

Post edited by Richard Haseltine on

Comments

  • RenpatsuRenpatsu Posts: 828
    edited December 1969

    G2M got a couple more, though not that many. G2F templates are organised a bit differently as well. Not sure if they ever add more templates to G2F, but could be by either DAZ or PAs. At some point I would certainly like to get the autofit procedure updated, especially since there always seems to be a small area in the front of tight dresses which comes out as a 'dent' - no matter if short or long dresses. If dresses are wider this appears to be less of an issue. Still not sure if that is an 'issue' with the templates or the clone.

  • Jason GalterioJason Galterio Posts: 2,562
    edited December 1969

    Ut-oh, black boxes covering boobage areas. You're gonna get yourself into trouble...

  • RCDescheneRCDeschene Posts: 2,801
    edited December 1969

    It seems like for G2F the Hair and Dress options are categorized while G2M simply has them all upfront. the only real difference between G2M and G2F's Autofits is the "Sock" option.

  • RCDescheneRCDeschene Posts: 2,801
    edited December 2013

    Renpatsu said:
    G2M got a couple more, though not that many. G2F templates are organised a bit differently as well. Not sure if they ever add more templates to G2F, but could be by either DAZ or PAs. At some point I would certainly like to get the autofit procedure updated, especially since there always seems to be a small area in the front of tight dresses which comes out as a 'dent' - no matter if short or long dresses. If dresses are wider this appears to be less of an issue. Still not sure if that is an 'issue' with the templates or the clone.

    Do you by chance have genital morphs active on the target figure? If so, try going into Hidden (which can be toggled on via Parameters tab) with the dress article selected and zero-out the genital's FBM morph.
    Post edited by RCDeschene on
  • RenpatsuRenpatsu Posts: 828
    edited December 2013

    Do you by chance have genital morphs active on the target figure? If so, try going into Hidden (which can be toggled on via Parameters tab) with the dress article selected and zero-out the genital's FBM morph.

    G2F out of the box, no additions, no morphs.

    Edit: added an image of a tight V4 dress autofitted to G2F.

    Screen_Shot_2013-12-04_at_12.37_.29_AM_.png
    247 x 347 - 60K
    Post edited by Renpatsu on
  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,260
    edited December 2013

    Renpatsu said:
    G2M got a couple more, though not that many. G2F templates are organised a bit differently as well. Not sure if they ever add more templates to G2F, but could be by either DAZ or PAs. At some point I would certainly like to get the autofit procedure updated, especially since there always seems to be a small area in the front of tight dresses which comes out as a 'dent' - no matter if short or long dresses. If dresses are wider this appears to be less of an issue. Still not sure if that is an 'issue' with the templates or the clone.

    ...yeah, I've had the occur a lot.

    One workaround is to set up a geometry shell with a G2F skirt and then set that it as the collision target for the autofit. If it doesn't already have smoothing in the parameters tab, you will also have to apply that to the autofit clothing as well from the edit menu (Edit/Object/ Geometry/Apply Smoothing Modifier) to activate collision detection.

    Post edited by kyoto kid on
  • JUJUJUJU Posts: 1,131
    edited December 1969

    What I miss most is the option "Robe - full Length".... there is only an option "dress - knee length" for G2F.... :(

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,260
    edited December 1969

    Juju said:
    What I miss most is the option "Robe - full Length".... there is only an option "dress - knee length" for G2F.... :(

    ...that would also work for long coats as well. I'm surprised there never was a "Dress - Full Length" option.

    Sashes and tied belts are usually mangled by autofit as well.

  • RCDescheneRCDeschene Posts: 2,801
    edited December 2013

    Juju said:
    What I miss most is the option "Robe - full Length".... there is only an option "dress - knee length" for G2F.... :(

    I suspect that's the G2F version of the "Tunic" option. Considering gender, it makes sense.
    Post edited by RCDeschene on
  • TaozTaoz Posts: 9,979
    edited December 1969

    Legionair said:
    Ut-oh, black boxes covering boobage areas. You're gonna get yourself into trouble...

    Why is that forbidden?

  • FSMCDesignsFSMCDesigns Posts: 12,783
    edited December 1969

    Taozen said:
    Legionair said:
    Ut-oh, black boxes covering boobage areas. You're gonna get yourself into trouble...

    Why is that forbidden?

    Silly DAZ rules
    http://www.daz3d.com/forums/discussion/3279_4/

  • TaozTaoz Posts: 9,979
    edited December 1969

    Taozen said:
    Legionair said:
    Ut-oh, black boxes covering boobage areas. You're gonna get yourself into trouble...

    Why is that forbidden?

    Silly DAZ rules
    http://www.daz3d.com/forums/discussion/3279_4/

    Hmm, so bars are allowed as long as they aren't black? Or maybe they mean coffee or cocktail bars? :)

  • Richard HaseltineRichard Haseltine Posts: 102,865
    edited December 1969

    Bars and other pasted on elements aren't allowed - they look tacky. The image showing the options could have been taken in smooth shaded mode without any problem.

  • Jason GalterioJason Galterio Posts: 2,562
    edited December 1969

    Taozen said:
    Legionair said:
    Ut-oh, black boxes covering boobage areas. You're gonna get yourself into trouble...

    Why is that forbidden?

    Hopefully my sarcasm came through in the written word. :cheese:

  • TaozTaoz Posts: 9,979
    edited December 1969

    Bars and other pasted on elements aren't allowed - they look tacky.

    So you're supposed to cover up that you're covering up? ;)

  • TaozTaoz Posts: 9,979
    edited December 1969

    Legionair said:
    Taozen said:
    Legionair said:
    Ut-oh, black boxes covering boobage areas. You're gonna get yourself into trouble...

    Why is that forbidden?

    Hopefully my sarcasm came through in the written word. :cheese:

    Definitely, but I failed to see the logical reason for such a rule (and still do). I doubt anyone would post a purely artistic render with black bars, and for a render posted because of a technical inquiry I'd find it irrelevant how you hide what you must not show.

  • RCDescheneRCDeschene Posts: 2,801
    edited December 1969

    Bars and other pasted on elements aren't allowed - they look tacky. The image showing the options could have been taken in smooth shaded mode without any problem.

    I'm sorry, but with all due respect to the rules, that reasoning is rather subjective. So what if it looks tacky? When we do that it's quick screenshots and renders to present an example of an issue, they're not high quality professional art pieces.
  • TaozTaoz Posts: 9,979
    edited December 1969

    Bars and other pasted on elements aren't allowed - they look tacky. The image showing the options could have been taken in smooth shaded mode without any problem.

    I'm sorry, but with all due respect to the rules, that reasoning is rather subjective. So what if it looks tacky? When we do that it's quick screenshots and renders to present an example of an issue, they're not high quality professional art pieces.

    Exactly.

Sign In or Register to comment.