Does the "default" shader include the subsurface scattering?

openlearneropenlearner Posts: 0
edited December 1969 in New Users

There is a separate shader for subsurface scattering but it is not listed in my shader options; is the "default" shader the subsurface shader?

Comments

  • JaderailJaderail Posts: 0
    edited December 1969

    No it is not, have you downloaded and installed the Free SSS shader? Here it is in the DAZ Studio Formats section.

    Capture2.png
    413 x 577 - 44K
    Capture1.png
    412 x 399 - 26K
  • openlearneropenlearner Posts: 0
    edited December 1969

    I see that, but when I right click and choose Merge and then Render, the result is exactly the same image as when I use the default shader.

  • Lissa_xyzLissa_xyz Posts: 6,116
    edited July 2013

    Shaders aren't scenes that you merge, they work on surface zones like textures. If using it on an object/character that already has texture maps, hold ctrl and double click the shader and set the maps to ignore and accept.

    Post edited by Lissa_xyz on
  • Richard HaseltineRichard Haseltine Posts: 100,948
    edited December 1969

    You do need to select the item and the surfaces you want to apply the shader to - the preset is a shader preset, which applies to any selected surface on any selected object, not a materials preset, which applies to named surfaces on any selected object regardless of whether or not the surfaces are selected.

    The Skin lighting mode on the default shader does do SSS, but its parameters are locked so it isn't flexible (and doesn't have the features of the SSS shader anyway).

  • edited December 1969

    When I add the subsurface shader base to an existing model, it radically changes the skin texture/colour in a bad way, is that normal?

  • Richard HaseltineRichard Haseltine Posts: 100,948
    edited December 1969

    Yes, the preview is not reliable - you should see something closer if you render.

  • edited December 1969

    Actually the render is even less like the original texture, turns out very pale and grey like goth make-up

  • SertorialSertorial Posts: 962
    edited December 1969

    Actually the render is even less like the original texture, turns out very pale and grey like goth make-up

    yes, I must say, I find it does that too.

  • SpottedKittySpottedKitty Posts: 7,232
    edited December 1969

    Actually the render is even less like the original texture, turns out very pale and grey like goth make-up

    Did you notice the post upthread about using -click to load the shader? This is vital if the object already has a texture applied — simply clicking to load the shader will discard any existing textures.
  • Richard HaseltineRichard Haseltine Posts: 100,948
    edited December 1969

    Actually the render is even less like the original texture, turns out very pale and grey like goth make-up

    Did you notice the post upthread about using -click to load the shader? This is vital if the object already has a texture applied — simply clicking to load the shader will discard any existing textures.

    That isn't true of the SSS Base - it is set up not to replace the maps.

  • SpottedKittySpottedKitty Posts: 7,232
    edited December 1969

    Ah, thanks — I didn't realise it was possible to set up a shader or surface material to not replace textures by default. Haven't had time to dig into these new SSS goodies yet, though.

  • edited December 1969

    So can this subsurface shader base be used in conjunction with an existing texture, without ruining the look of the existing texture. I like the additional options it offers but the existing texture is a big part of my character, I don't want to not be able to use it

  • jerriecanjerriecan Posts: 470
    edited December 1969

    I found out it could by accident, but didn't know how to apply it to a new figure deliberately. This is exactly the information I was looking for. Thanks so much for the answers! :)

  • fixmypcmikefixmypcmike Posts: 19,583
    edited December 1969

    So can this subsurface shader base be used in conjunction with an existing texture, without ruining the look of the existing texture. I like the additional options it offers but the existing texture is a big part of my character, I don't want to not be able to use it

    Yes, it does not replace the textures (for other shaders, if you hold down Ctrl while double-clicking you can choose not to replace textures).

  • JaderailJaderail Posts: 0
    edited December 1969

    To get the LOOK your after you need to read the SSS info and then adjust the shader once you have it applied to your figure. Keep in mind SSS is very LIGHT driven so I suggest having you lights Render ready when you add the SSS Shader so your adjustments are what you get in the final render. The look of SSS will change as the lighting does. It's not meant to be a Add and Render type shader, it needs the user to set it up as you use it.

  • edited December 1969

    Jaderail said:
    To get the LOOK your after you need to read the SSS info and then adjust the shader once you have it applied to your figure. Keep in mind SSS is very LIGHT driven so I suggest having you lights Render ready when you add the SSS Shader so your adjustments are what you get in the final render. The look of SSS will change as the lighting does. It's not meant to be a Add and Render type shader, it needs the user to set it up as you use it.

    I'm still learning the basics of lighting, should I postpone trying to use this shader until I know more about lighting?

  • JaderailJaderail Posts: 0
    edited December 1969

    I don't think so, you can get very good results with SSS with just basic lighting, the real trick is to understand SSS and what it's doing. Read the info and then test a little, before long it should become easy.

Sign In or Register to comment.