V6, DAZ's most successful release?

13468919

Comments

  • icprncssicprncss Posts: 3,694
    edited December 1969

    the V4 for V6 wont let you use V4 morphs will it?

    No, but Dimension 3D is working on an update for GenX. Unfortunately, the update will not be free.

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,252
    edited December 1969

    Zev0 said:
    Frank0314 said:
    i don't see support for Genesis 1 stopping anytime soon.

    Agreed Frank, and I think that is what most people are fearing. To most of us it is still a very viable platform that hasn't reached its potential yet, and if support for it from customers are still in great demand, we will still produce content for it.
    ...it's loss of support for the previous generation figures and their compatibility with G2 which is the concern I have. Daz already has pretty much shown their intent by not providing this capability (hence why V.2 for G2F is PA product) as they did with the original Genesis.

  • CypherFOXCypherFOX Posts: 3,401
    edited December 1969

    Greetings,

    icprncss said:
    the V4 for V6 wont let you use V4 morphs will it?

    No, but Dimension 3D is working on an update for GenX. Unfortunately, the update will not be free.Why in the world would it be? Is it so 'unfortunate' that people want to be paid for doing things that are hard?

    In a larger sense, I get that times are tough, but...times being tough for one person, or even many, doesn't mean that other people, or companies, should stop moving forward. If that were the case, we would not have...well, anything.

    'Please don't grow feet! If you do, someday you'll use 'fish' as a verb!' said the fish to the first amphibian. ;)

    -- Morgan

  • MattymanxMattymanx Posts: 6,955
    edited December 1969

    jonjon said:
    This whole fear or hatred of change with so many on this forum is hilarious. It uses the same base argument as this:

    I'm still really upset that there just isn't the support there used to be for my 1954 Cadillac Eldorado. True, all these "new" or "modern" cars might have things like anti-lock brakes, better gas millage, air bags, or even the way over blown features like MP3 players, GPS navigation systems, emergency support through OnStar, etc. I don't need any of those things and as a whole they are mostly worthless. It is really crappy that Cadillac doesn't offer the support they used to for this car, what I would argue is an all around better car (minus the efficiency, safety measures, and modern convenience) and that all the parts they use in their newer models aren't backwards compatible is just a stupid business decision and offensive to all the people that invested in their older and better car.

    In one of the fastest developing and growing segment of technology (3D in general, not necessarily Daz / Poserdom), how many companies still actively develop for software or technologies released 10 years ago? Or even 5 years ago? Even amidst all the complaints that Apple receives for releasing yet another version of an iPhone, almost one generation per year, you can bet they won't stop releasing new versions because things get better, faster, and it makes them money, and not doing it would be stupid. Why does it seem artists in this space seem to want the 3D world to stagnate instead of move forward?


    I totally agree with you and I have often wondered about the answer to that question my self.

  • FSMCDesignsFSMCDesigns Posts: 12,782
    edited December 1969

    Mattymanx said:
    jonjon said:
    This whole fear or hatred of change with so many on this forum is hilarious. It uses the same base argument as this:

    I'm still really upset that there just isn't the support there used to be for my 1954 Cadillac Eldorado. True, all these "new" or "modern" cars might have things like anti-lock brakes, better gas millage, air bags, or even the way over blown features like MP3 players, GPS navigation systems, emergency support through OnStar, etc. I don't need any of those things and as a whole they are mostly worthless. It is really crappy that Cadillac doesn't offer the support they used to for this car, what I would argue is an all around better car (minus the efficiency, safety measures, and modern convenience) and that all the parts they use in their newer models aren't backwards compatible is just a stupid business decision and offensive to all the people that invested in their older and better car.

    In one of the fastest developing and growing segment of technology (3D in general, not necessarily Daz / Poserdom), how many companies still actively develop for software or technologies released 10 years ago? Or even 5 years ago? Even amidst all the complaints that Apple receives for releasing yet another version of an iPhone, almost one generation per year, you can bet they won't stop releasing new versions because things get better, faster, and it makes them money, and not doing it would be stupid. Why does it seem artists in this space seem to want the 3D world to stagnate instead of move forward?


    I totally agree with you and I have often wondered about the answer to that question my self.

    I have no problem embracing change and innovation, As a long time poser user i did just that with genesis which is my figure and now app of choice. i just don't see G2/V6 as a step forward since much of the innovation that G1 gave us is no longer an option or harder to achieve with G2. If the new iphone came out with a rotary dialer, no camera and no access to internet, you can bet a whole lot less apple fanatics would not be rushing to get their hands on it. I'm also pretty sure the new Caddy has all the same functionality the old caddy had and then some, so poor analogy.

  • SickleYieldSickleYield Posts: 7,644
    edited December 1969

    Kattey said:
    "PAs won't have to make fix morphs" is an advantage to a new figure, not a drawback.

    I'm sure that somebody will still be making those fix morphs anyway.

    No figure will ever be made that can't be morphed better, in my opinion. ;) Even a very good base figure can be improved. And the more a customer works with a figure, the more they will notice those areas of potential improvement, where the maker may not have been able to spend those weeks and months with the finished piece.

  • TheKDTheKD Posts: 2,703
    edited June 2013

    jonjon said:
    This whole fear or hatred of change with so many on this forum is hilarious. It uses the same base argument as this:

    I'm still really upset that there just isn't the support there used to be for my 1954 Cadillac Eldorado. True, all these "new" or "modern" cars might have things like anti-lock brakes, better gas millage, air bags, or even the way over blown features like MP3 players, GPS navigation systems, emergency support through OnStar, etc. I don't need any of those things and as a whole they are mostly worthless. It is really crappy that Cadillac doesn't offer the support they used to for this car, what I would argue is an all around better car (minus the efficiency, safety measures, and modern convenience) and that all the parts they use in their newer models aren't backwards compatible is just a stupid business decision and offensive to all the people that invested in their older and better car.

    Apples to oranges here dude. I still get plenty of "support" with my vehicles from the 80's, and no, I really don't need any of that new fangled crap on them either :P I can do most repairs on them myself, not so on the 2002 beemer, even simple things like sparkplug changes are a pain in the ass lol.

    Besides, we are talking about things not so old as 1954 here, we are speaking about stuff just a few years old. If ford dealership sold me a car, then a few years later told me they will no longer offer maintenance and repairs, to try and force me to upgrade to a new car..... Well let's hope they have fire insurance :P

    Same with everything really, when I buy something, I take care of it, and expect it to last a while. Maybe you are fine with the model the computer software industry seems to run on, I am not. Keep bloating programs, because the newer computers can run them with their 16cores and 200 gigs of ram lol.

    We spent a lot of money on genesis stuff, and if genesis were suddenly to become obsolete and unsupported so soon, yeah I would be pissed. The best thing about genesis was that we didn't have to wait for vendors to start supporting teens and kids, because they never will more than likely, and I could just use everything from the whole genesis line I already have for ones I made myself. I did the same with V4, but it was a lot more tedious. Having to use wardrobe wizard to fit the clothes halfway decent, then more often than not taking it into other programs to fix the mesh problems shrinking the giant boobs always caused etc etc. Genesis made the tedious work, not so tedious, and not as long and drawn out. Until G2 gets to the same point or better, I am sticking with my V4 characters and G1 personally. And as a carrara user, I am mostly still using V4, and grumbling about how no one ever supports carrara. Can't even use any of the bend fix stuff in carrara like poser and DS can. Oh well, I need to walk 30 miles to the store, uphill, with only one boot you whippersnappers. Peace :P

    Ugh, are the smileys ever gonna work again. All the dead smileys are tongue sticking out guy, in case you can't tell lol.

    Post edited by TheKD on
  • LordHardDrivenLordHardDriven Posts: 937
    edited December 1969

    jonjon said:
    This whole fear or hatred of change with so many on this forum is hilarious. It uses the same base argument as this:

    I'm still really upset that there just isn't the support there used to be for my 1954 Cadillac Eldorado. True, all these "new" or "modern" cars might have things like anti-lock brakes, better gas millage, air bags, or even the way over blown features like MP3 players, GPS navigation systems, emergency support through OnStar, etc. I don't need any of those things and as a whole they are mostly worthless. It is really crappy that Cadillac doesn't offer the support they used to for this car, what I would argue is an all around better car (minus the efficiency, safety measures, and modern convenience) and that all the parts they use in their newer models aren't backwards compatible is just a stupid business decision and offensive to all the people that invested in their older and better car.

    In one of the fastest developing and growing segment of technology (3D in general, not necessarily Daz / Poserdom), how many companies still actively develop for software or technologies released 10 years ago? Or even 5 years ago? Even amidst all the complaints that Apple receives for releasing yet another version of an iPhone, almost one generation per year, you can bet they won't stop releasing new versions because things get better, faster, and it makes them money, and not doing it would be stupid. Why does it seem artists in this space seem to want the 3D world to stagnate instead of move forward?

    Your analogy is way off from what is going on here. If people were saying "I'm unhappy with Genesis 2 because V1 is still plenty good enough then maybe your analogy would work. A better analogy would be if Someone who bought a 2011 Cadillac was being told they need to buy the newer 2013 Cadillac because it has a few minor improvements. Again the cars and 3D models don't really compare because people don't buy cars for the same reasons they buy 3D content and as such the expectations are entirely different.

  • larsmidnattlarsmidnatt Posts: 4,511
    edited June 2013


    Someone who bought a 2011 Cadillac was being told they need to buy the newer 2013 Cadillac because it has a few minor improvements.

    No one is telling you you need to buy the new car though. And frankly I DO get messages every year from my car manufacturer advertising the new version with minor improvements. You never know I may have the money to reinvest in a car after two years, but it's not required.

    And frankly I don't have the money to replace my car every year, but once I did exchange my car after 18 months. And it was partly due to my preferred car dealer messaging me with a deal for an upgraded model.

    But analogies can only go so far really.

    Post edited by larsmidnatt on
  • StratDragonStratDragon Posts: 3,251
    edited December 1969

    Cypherfox said:
    Greetings,
    icprncss said:
    the V4 for V6 wont let you use V4 morphs will it?

    No, but Dimension 3D is working on an update for GenX. Unfortunately, the update will not be free.

    Why in the world would it be? Is it so 'unfortunate' that people want to be paid for doing things that are hard?

    In a larger sense, I get that times are tough, but...times being tough for one person, or even many, doesn't mean that other people, or companies, should stop moving forward. If that were the case, we would not have...well, anything.

    'Please don't grow feet! If you do, someday you'll use 'fish' as a verb!' said the fish to the first amphibian. ;)

    -- Morgan

    and some modelers make their work free for unrestricted use because they like to, in fact one of the greatest sets of morphs for V4 and Genisis are a free download.
    http://www.sharecg.com/v/58061/
    http://www.sharecg.com/v/58198/

    If I could use content that I already paid for to work with something new I might have the insensitive to buy other products for that product. If I have to pay to use what I already use I might just stick with what I already use and disregard that new product.

  • LordHardDrivenLordHardDriven Posts: 937
    edited December 1969

    Given the products you make and are even promoting in your sig I'd think you would be very unhappy with the release of G2F how many more of your products released in the past few months would sell if there wasn't a more realistic and accurate figure available that maybe doesn't need so much of that stuff to achieve realism?

    "PAs won't have to make fix morphs" is an advantage to a new figure, not a drawback.

    Not if it's a PA who mainly makes fix morphs, then one that doesn't need it is taking away his bread and butter. That wasn't exactly the point I was making though. The customers here have a herd mentality which is also part of why this end up being such a good release for Daz. So If I followed the herd and had a better figure that didn't need fix morphs then why would I buy Zev0's fix morphs he's released in the last month? Wouldn't it be better for Zev0 if Daz waited and allowed more of the customers wanting more realism, to buy Zev0's fix morphs and then release G2 at a later date when the sales of fix morphs has died off more? The people loyal to G1 likely already have zev0's fix morphs which may even add to their anger since they could have applied that money to buying the new figure rather then a fix morph the new figure might not need. Those who are fine with the new figure aren't likely to go back and buy zev0's fix morphs to make g1 more realistic because they can just use G2.

  • LordHardDrivenLordHardDriven Posts: 937
    edited December 1969

    Cypherfox said:
    Greetings,
    icprncss said:
    the V4 for V6 wont let you use V4 morphs will it?

    No, but Dimension 3D is working on an update for GenX. Unfortunately, the update will not be free.

    Why in the world would it be? Is it so 'unfortunate' that people want to be paid for doing things that are hard?

    In a larger sense, I get that times are tough, but...times being tough for one person, or even many, doesn't mean that other people, or companies, should stop moving forward. If that were the case, we would not have...well, anything.

    'Please don't grow feet! If you do, someday you'll use 'fish' as a verb!' said the fish to the first amphibian. ;)

    -- Morgan

    Why would it be? Because traditionally, updates, especially one for relatively minor changes have been free to customers who bought the original. Historically it's only major revisions that are more or less completely reworked versions of the original are what gets charged for. Apparently by your thinking you feel Smith Micro should force people to pay whenever they come out with a service release for Poser. Fortunately Smith Micro and many other creators of software don't see things the way you do.

  • CypherFOXCypherFOX Posts: 3,401
    edited December 1969

    Greetings,

    Cypherfox said:
    Greetings,
    icprncss said:
    the V4 for V6 wont let you use V4 morphs will it?

    No, but Dimension 3D is working on an update for GenX. Unfortunately, the update will not be free.

    Why in the world would it be? Is it so 'unfortunate' that people want to be paid for doing things that are hard?

    In a larger sense, I get that times are tough, but...times being tough for one person, or even many, doesn't mean that other people, or companies, should stop moving forward. If that were the case, we would not have...well, anything.

    'Please don't grow feet! If you do, someday you'll use 'fish' as a verb!' said the fish to the first amphibian. ;)

    -- Morgan

    Why would it be? Because traditionally, updates, especially one for relatively minor changes have been free to customers who bought the original. Historically it's only major revisions that are more or less completely reworked versions of the original are what gets charged for. Apparently by your thinking you feel Smith Micro should force people to pay whenever they come out with a service release for Poser. Fortunately Smith Micro and many other creators of software don't see things the way you do.

    And because you don't know how to do it, it must be a 'relatively minor change' for D3D to retool GenX to support Gen2.

    I see.

    -- Morgan

  • icprncssicprncss Posts: 3,694
    edited December 1969

    Cypherfox said:
    Greetings,
    icprncss said:
    the V4 for V6 wont let you use V4 morphs will it?

    No, but Dimension 3D is working on an update for GenX. Unfortunately, the update will not be free.

    Why in the world would it be? Is it so 'unfortunate' that people want to be paid for doing things that are hard?

    In a larger sense, I get that times are tough, but...times being tough for one person, or even many, doesn't mean that other people, or companies, should stop moving forward. If that were the case, we would not have...well, anything.

    'Please don't grow feet! If you do, someday you'll use 'fish' as a verb!' said the fish to the first amphibian. ;)

    -- Morgan

    Because others in the thread for GenX and DSF toolbox keep asking if the upgrade will be free.

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,252
    edited December 1969

    ...yeah if I get a car, it won't be anything newer than 1975 as that is the cutoff here for DEQ compliance. Loved the old cars for if something broke, you went to the wrecking yard or parts store, bought a new part and were able to put it in yourself. Today, they should just bolt down the bonnet and put a warning on that reads 'No User Serviceable Parts Inside". One friend mentioned that if he even did his own oil change, it would void the warranty.

    Getting to the main topic, my one other fear is that new character/clothing ccontent will be geared more towards G2F and not the Original Genesis. The same occurred with Gen4 after Genesis was released. Yes there was still some new content available, but pretty much support began to wane for Gen4 as it increased for Genesis. With G2F I don't see that trend changing at all. I will admit I am surprised that the reissues of AprilYSH's hairs are both Genesis and G2F compatible. But then again, we saw this in the early Genesis days where something had both Gen4 and Genesis fits/compatibility.

    I guess it's a "wait and see" situation. Though maybe its time to really sit down and learn how to make clothing content just in case.

  • IvyIvy Posts: 7,165
    edited December 1969

    Ivy said:
    Ivy said:
    DAZ has caught the interest of many commercial investors with the release of Daz Studio 4... so disgruntled hobbyists (with smaller pocketbooks) are not their most lucrative merchants.

    And if you want your older figures supported, you have to show that support with your wallet, not forum posts.

    I have to agree. as a primary poser user I don't buy anything Genesis never have since it was released. & with poser's new sub-div. I can pretty much do anything i want with poser that Genesis can do.

    I can't afford content for both poser & Genesis programs and seeming i just paid $249 for poser pro2014 In these financial tough times i figure if i can't use the products in both daz and poser with out having a bunch of tools in order to make it work what is the sense of buying it. & Besides almost all my poser content works great Daz4,6 with little adjustment in textures. and I am not criticizing Genesis. I am sure Genesis is great for some people. But my primary use is for cartoon animation so i really don't need all the, this and that Genesis morphs. I already have enough characters in my runtime now.
    Though I will admit. its to bad Genesis clothing sets does not integrate well with V4 and Alyson II . because there is some Genesis clothing i would like to have in my runtime. but working with it is not worth the effort to me anyway. If Daz was my primary 3D program then I might invested in Genesis products. but not when I'm trying to buy & use content in Multiple 3d programs, so Genesis just does fit my needs for that reason.

    Other than that Daz4.6 is a great improvement over daz4.0 and i really am liking it alot.
    I love the spot render tool and how much faster it renders larger 1920 x1080 animation scene. It loads faster and I had less crashes with daz4.6 so it is possible Daz's claim that Daz4.6 & v6 is the best release yet , for the simple reason the original Daz4.0 & Genesis was so terrible to use. But that is just my own opinion and reason why i don't buy or use anything Genesis.

    That's not what I meant when I posted that. You're talking about not buying content at all and that supports nothing.

    That is not true I never said I'm not buying content. i buy content all the time. i just buy nothing genesis, I mostly buy environments
    and clothing that I can use for both poser and daz.
    I don't buy anything genesis for the reasons above I gave you. Now if the venders had made the same product for genesis to work with v4 as well then i may have considered buying it. and I have bought clothing models that work both for genesis & v4 and because i can use v4 in poser with out having to have extra tools. to use it. and then to me that character would be a good buy to fill my run-time with a product i can use in Multiple 3d programs. and that supports the vender that support many 3D programs and not just genesis

    But please don't use my arguments as anti-genesis, we're not talking about the same thing. I'm talking about genesis one support.

    Ohhhhhh.......

    OK...what?!?!

    See... when you said this:

    And if you want your older figures supported, you have to show that support with your wallet, not forum posts.

    I really thought you were talking about "older" figures...

    OK... you aren't seriously calling Genesis(1) an "older" figure are you? Cuz, I think at least PART of the complaining has been about the fact that Genesis is not that old...

    People are not hesitating about buying for Genesis because it's an "older" figure.... *shakes head*

    People who have not bought into Genesis are going to... what?? Suddenly want to buy Genesis 2 just cuz it's newer??

    I'm guessing no.

    OK... more of my worthless opinion ahead:

    People who have not bought into Genesis have many reasons for not doing it. Some are just mad at Daz. Some are just not happy with how it works in their program of choice. Some just don't want to invest into yet another line of products that may be outdated in a year... there are other reasons, too, I'm sure...

    But I promise you, they don't regard Genesis as an "older figure"

    It's not because the products are bad either... The PA's are doing an awesome job of trying to be supportive of the NEW figure...

    if sales are not stellar it's not because people don't want to support the PA's... it's because they don't want to support Genesis.
    (See above as to why)

    I don't expect that to change much with a new version.

    Why?

    Cuz the hope is that the "improvements" to the mesh are going to entice those who did not buy before to suddenly now want the "New... um... er... yeah... Newer" figure, is that right?

    OK... um... if the customer never bought into Genesis... what would they have to compare the newer one to? I'm saying, if they didn't own the first one, they don't have anything to compare to for the newer one.

    I'm guessing that those who buy/bought into V6 are those who already bought into V5 and the original Genesis, or they are brand new and just getting acquainted with Daz...

    Those people who were not buying before... I don't imagine they will buy the new one either...

    Advice for PA's:

    Make what YOUR customers say they want... and don't worry too much about what Daz encourages and says they "would like" you to make...

    after all... they are YOUR customers....

    ok... end of worthless opinion....

    Actually I do make what I want, however too many times you see posts where people say they want something, you give it to them and they either don't buy it or stick on their wishlists, so it ends up a waste of my time where I could be making something else. Even worse is when you provide something and someone says "I'll wait until it's 50% off." PAs don't create items for sale for them to be deeply discounted; that's also a waste of their time. They attempt to provide things that customers want at a price that they think is fair for the time they've invested in it.

    That said, the last week there's been a lot of confusion about Gen2 and incorrect statements about being the end of Gen1 simply weren't true due to mass speculation and lack of information that really should have been more detailed so people actually understood what Gen2/V6 actually was... and because of that, a lot of people stopped buying the Gen1 stuff thinking they were going to end the figure. So if you want PAs to continue to provide Gen 1 products you need to show that support by purchasing those products. If you don't buy them, then there's no need for us to take our time to provide you with those products.

    That's what I'm saying.

    Thanks that Clarify things and i understand now what you are saying now

  • LordHardDrivenLordHardDriven Posts: 937
    edited December 1969


    Someone who bought a 2011 Cadillac was being told they need to buy the newer 2013 Cadillac because it has a few minor improvements.

    No one is telling you you need to buy the new car though. And frankly I DO get messages every year from my car manufacturer advertising the new version with minor improvements. You never know I may have the money to reinvest in a car after two years, but it's not required.

    And frankly I don't have the money to replace my car every year, but once I did exchange my car after 18 months. And it was partly due to my preferred car dealer messaging me with a deal for an upgraded model.

    But analogies can only go so far really.

    I know but there is a lot that is saying to me I need to buy V6. Mostly the way releases have gone from this company for the past Decade or so I've been a customer here. Sure lots of people are saying G1 isn't going any where and will still be supported for some time but those words were said in the past too and yet it didn't play out that way. What is different now that should make me or anyone else believe it'll somehow be different this time?

  • IvyIvy Posts: 7,165
    edited December 1969

    1. Fact: I didn't buy V6. Nothing against DAZ, or Genesis 2, just not what I'm needing right now. Spent a fair amount on other things.
    2. Fact: I have no idea how many V6 and V6 products Daz sold.
    3. Fact: Any opinion I have about how the sales of V6 went are simply things I made up. See #2
    4. Using facts in an internet discussion is a complete waste of time. People believe what they have made up is just as valid as any fact, perhaps even more so. And can come up with multiple reasons why this is so.
    5. Some day, people will realize that discussions of this kind throw considerable insight into how the human mind works.

    I missed this earlier... but I feel compelled to comment.
    Of course, I can only speak for myself.

    It doesn't matter to me
    1. Who may agree with me or not
    2. Who may be analyzing me or not.
    3. Who may be intimidating me or not.

    I will always do what I think is right.

    Always.

    well said and i agree with you

  • LordHardDrivenLordHardDriven Posts: 937
    edited December 1969

    Cypherfox said:
    Greetings,
    Cypherfox said:
    Greetings,
    icprncss said:
    the V4 for V6 wont let you use V4 morphs will it?

    No, but Dimension 3D is working on an update for GenX. Unfortunately, the update will not be free.

    Why in the world would it be? Is it so 'unfortunate' that people want to be paid for doing things that are hard?

    In a larger sense, I get that times are tough, but...times being tough for one person, or even many, doesn't mean that other people, or companies, should stop moving forward. If that were the case, we would not have...well, anything.

    'Please don't grow feet! If you do, someday you'll use 'fish' as a verb!' said the fish to the first amphibian. ;)

    -- Morgan

    Why would it be? Because traditionally, updates, especially one for relatively minor changes have been free to customers who bought the original. Historically it's only major revisions that are more or less completely reworked versions of the original are what gets charged for. Apparently by your thinking you feel Smith Micro should force people to pay whenever they come out with a service release for Poser. Fortunately Smith Micro and many other creators of software don't see things the way you do.

    And because you don't know how to do it, it must be a 'relatively minor change' for D3D to retool GenX to support Gen2.

    I see.

    -- Morgan

    I know, if I knew how to do it I'd cut D3D out of the equation completely but just because I don't know how to do it isn't justification for me to have to repay someone for something I bought relatively recently simply because someone else decided Genesis is better off being split into two figures rather then staying as one.

  • ghastlycomicghastlycomic Posts: 2,531
    edited December 1969

    jonjon said:
    Why does it seem artists in this space seem to want the 3D world to stagnate instead of move forward?

    Because people see the abandonment of the Genesis concept (which is what Genesis 2 is, it is Genesis in name only) as a step backwards and not a move forward. An improved Genesis mesh would be one thing, but all Genesis 2 is, is an improved V4 and M4 mesh. Everything that made Genesis the versatile figure that it was has been chucked out the window so that vendors will be able to double sell their content which won't happen. There are already free male and androgynous morphs available for the Genesis 2 female so I predict the Genesis 2 male figure will end up becoming virtually unused and unsupported and the Genesis 2 female figure will be used as a unimesh.

    Adding 2000 new polygons to the mesh has only resulted in a minor improvement to the figure. To use your car analogy. People who bought a 2011 Cadillac are now worried that GM is going to discontinue all support and service for their car because GM is telling them the 2011 Cadillac is a piece of crap and they need to buy the 2013 because it has fancier hubcaps.

    As I said before, almost all this strife could have been avoided if Daz had simply not named this figure Genesis 2. It's not a Genesis figure.

  • larsmidnattlarsmidnatt Posts: 4,511
    edited December 1969

    What is different now that should make me or anyone else believe it'll somehow be different this time?

    Unfortunately I can't say anything to reassure you. my bad.

  • agent unawaresagent unawares Posts: 3,513
    edited December 1969

    Given the products you make and are even promoting in your sig I'd think you would be very unhappy with the release of G2F how many more of your products released in the past few months would sell if there wasn't a more realistic and accurate figure available that maybe doesn't need so much of that stuff to achieve realism?

    "PAs won't have to make fix morphs" is an advantage to a new figure, not a drawback.

    Not if it's a PA who mainly makes fix morphs, then one that doesn't need it is taking away his bread and butter. That wasn't exactly the point I was making though. The customers here have a herd mentality which is also part of why this end up being such a good release for Daz. So If I followed the herd and had a better figure that didn't need fix morphs then why would I buy Zev0's fix morphs he's released in the last month? Wouldn't it be better for Zev0 if Daz waited and allowed more of the customers wanting more realism, to buy Zev0's fix morphs and then release G2 at a later date when the sales of fix morphs has died off more? The people loyal to G1 likely already have zev0's fix morphs which may even add to their anger since they could have applied that money to buying the new figure rather then a fix morph the new figure might not need. Those who are fine with the new figure aren't likely to go back and buy zev0's fix morphs to make g1 more realistic because they can just use G2.
    It might have been slightly better for Zev0's sales if the release were put off, sure. I can't say. But that's not a good reason to stop moving forward. Imagine what Zev0 can do with an additional, better figure. The Shape Shift morphs for one are going to be stunning on G2 because there's a better mesh and no pressure at all to develop them thinking of male shapes. They can complement the female figure and the female figure alone, and they are going to be beautiful. Same exact thing goes for any future aging, collision, movement, and fix morphs.

    I'm still buying things for Genesis, it's multipurpose, fantastic, and likely will always be my goto figure for creatures until an improved androgynous base figure is developed. It's not being obsoleted for anyone unless their main use is female characters, in which case, well, old figures going obsolete is a good thing - it means technology is looking up.

  • agent unawaresagent unawares Posts: 3,513
    edited June 2013

    I know, if I knew how to do it I'd cut D3D out of the equation completely but just because I don't know how to do it isn't justification for me to have to repay someone for something I bought relatively recently simply because someone else decided Genesis is better off being split into two figures rather then staying as one.

    You're not "repaying" anyone for anything. Your GenX for Genesis isn't going to stop working.

    EDIT: Supporting an entire new figure is not the same thing as a "service release."

    Post edited by agent unawares on
  • TheKDTheKD Posts: 2,703
    edited June 2013

    That is the crux of the matter isn't it? When genesis came out, it was marketted and hyped as the figure that would END that very need. All new characters were going to be made from the genesis. All clothes would fit everything from now on etc etc. A lot of people bought into that concept. Now they took a step back on that, and decided to release a "whole new figure" instead. In reality, two new figures, since they need a male too, and a kid figure if they even bother with it this time around.

    I know in gen4 male vendor support lacked bigtime, and kids were non existent practically. The vendors all go by what sells, and apparently that is idealized perfect woman with big boobs, and slutty clothing. Going by that, who knows, maybe they won't even bother making a "G2" male and kid at all, if sales are really that crappy.

    Post edited by TheKD on
  • CypherFOXCypherFOX Posts: 3,401
    edited December 1969

    Greetings,
    There is, in all groups, a tension between those who insist 'This is a fertile land and we will thrive if we remain here.' and those who think, 'I wonder what's over that next hill?'

    -- Morgan

  • frank0314frank0314 Posts: 14,313
    edited December 1969

    The sad truth is male content doesn't sell well. If the sales were better you'd see more of it. The females seem to be what everyone want and its backed up by the number of sales you have. Why would a PA spend 2 months working on a male to get a quarter of the money that the female character would get in the same time frame

  • FSMCDesignsFSMCDesigns Posts: 12,782
    edited December 1969

    Frank0314 said:
    The sad truth is male content doesn't sell well. If the sales were better you'd see more of it. The females seem to be what everyone want and its backed up by the number of sales you have. Why would a PA spend 2 months working on a male to get a quarter of the money that the female character would get in the same time frame

    So point in fact, why create 2 separate figures now? Why not just stick with the first genesis concept so that the vendors don't have double the workload and get to please both sides?

  • TheKDTheKD Posts: 2,703
    edited December 1969

    Sucks to be in a minority I guess lol. Genesis 1 solved that problem, well not solved, but at least made it not as bad. I supported people that make normal looking clothes, and some of them at least, could be used for males and females, of any particular age above 4 years old lol.

  • edited December 1969

    Since I don't think anyone here on any of these threads (with the exception of PAs maybe?) have seen the G2M figure, right now it is all speculation that morphs and cloths and poses and textures and everything else is not going to be compatible with the male figure. What if the underlying structure of the Male figure is the same as the female for the majority of things and have just gender / size (for kids) specific things for those that really are for women and not men, like size of breasts or where weight is on the heavies? Although, that would mean I have to keep using G1 for all my thai lady-boy renders, that is really an often neglected market by the big stores.

    It would be a bad move for Daz to not have them be able to share as much as possible between the male and female characters and keep it "genesisy", one, despite all the cynics on here that love to speculate the doom and gloom or insist change is bad, I don't see them making. Ask yourself if the male figure and items made for either figure were usable on both without issue yet have the added gender specific details would you be so up in arms? What is the likely-hood Daz would abandon all the flexibility that G1 provided when that is the big thing they have been pushing all along? (note, those are hypothetical questions.. I'm sure a lot would still be up in arms because I haven't seen any change that Daz has done.. ever.. that wasn't met with cries of "this is the worst thing ever")

  • Satira CapriccioSatira Capriccio Posts: 523
    edited December 1969

    I didn't purchase the Pro bundle. I wasn't interested in most of the products. As it was, I only ever purchased two of the products that were in the pro bundle.

    What I purchased was the Victoria 4.0 Complete bundle, which is now called the Victoria 4.2 Starter bundle. The regular price was and still is $49.95. It was on sale for 30% off for $34.97. However, when I checked my order, I saw there was a $$10.49 discount also applied to the order. Which is why my spreadsheet shows a price of $24.48 for the bundle. I don't remember (after all ... it was more than six years ago), why there was an additional discount for the bundle.

    The list of products included in the Victoria 4.0 Complete / Victoria 4.2 Starter bundle is now listed as
    Victoria 4.2 Base
    Victoria 4.2 Morphs ++ (which included the genitalia)
    Victoria 4 Skin Maps (Std Res)
    Amarseda Hair
    Basicwear for V4

    However, the Developer Kit is not listed in the bundle, even though it was included at the time I purchased it.

    The Victoria 6 Starter bundle costs $55.97 (30% off) / $39.18 (51% off PC) and includes
    Victoria 6
    Caped Rogue
    Garden Party Dress
    Nocturne Poses for V6
    Nordic Hair
    Charm Hair
    Nyssa

    Still, the V6 Starter bundle at $55.97 compared to $49.95 is more expensive. Granted, it's only a wee bit more than $5, and the starter bundle contains more content products than the V4 Starter bundle. Which again ... is why all this comparison of V4/V5/V6 sales numbers/possible sales numbers is like comparing apples to oranges.

    As for why I quoted you? Convenience. You were the last post in the discussion about the V4 sales numbers. I wasn't directing my post at you ... anymore than I was directing at anyone else.

    It's just my thoughts on the futility of comparing sales/numbers from seven years ago to those of last week.

    jimzombie said:
    @Satira Capriccio: What, why am I quoted here? I think you're figures for the Victoria products are off. I doubt they are more expensive now then at release. There was actually a lot more stuff in the V4 pro bundle http://www.daz3d.com/victoria-4-2-pro-bundle - lot more expensive than what you've got down too. Historicaly DAZ characters are getting cheaper, not more expensive. V1 cost almost 200 bucks.
Sign In or Register to comment.